decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Have your cake and eat it too. | 305 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Oracle asks the Court asks for
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 25 2012 @ 10:49 AM EDT
-> Oracle asks the Court for a new trial.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Have your cake and eat it too.
Authored by: J.F. on Monday, June 25 2012 @ 01:18 PM EDT
"Oracle wants to have its cake and eat it too."

This "quote" always riles me up as it's BACKWARDS. Of COURSE you can
have your cake and eat it too! What sick, sadist, son of a ^%&^% hands you a
piece of cake but won't let you eat it??? In fact, it's the ONLY way you can eat
your cake is if you have it first. If you don't have it, you have nothing to
eat!

Now consider the other way around - try to eat your cake and have it too. NOW we
run into a clear problem... you've eaten the cake; it's gone; you can't have it
anymore (not without regurgitating it, which is another issue altogether). See?
Makes a lot more sense than the other way around.

People saying "have your cake and eat it too" bugs me almost as much
as people saying "yes" when someone asks if they mind. Really? Yes,
they do mind? Most people mean to say "no," they DON'T mind. Two areas
most people say the OPPOSITE of what makes sense to a rational, thinking
person.
</rant>

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )