decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Drug dealers *are* making that argument now... | 305 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Oracle is following the Caldera business model
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 08:37 AM EDT
Meh, Murder has been big business for millennia.

What's that quote?
"Murder is illegal unless it is performed in large numbers and to the sound
of trumpets."

If you can do that with murder, everything else is small fry.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Drug dealers *are* making that argument now...
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 27 2012 @ 12:59 AM EDT

There is current debate about the legality of companies that openly keeps changing the exact formulation of their mind-bending recreational drugs to stay ahead of the governments adding their previous products to the banned lists.

For that issue, I would argue that any artificial substance or artificially modified organism and its produce should (under a reformed law) automatically fall in one of 4 categories A. Accepted legal substance (such as perfume or salt) as listed by the appropriate agency. B. Explicitly banned substance. C. Experimental chemical substance not allowed outside the lab until authorities have classified it as one of the other 3 or D. Approved farmaceutical drug, subject to the usual regulation.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )