|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 08:56 PM EDT |
| I dunno how you do it, but you sure do it well. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Ian Al on Thursday, June 21 2012 @ 02:16 AM EDT |
The under-the-breath mutterings were priceless ($0).
It is wonderful how you report Oracle going over the cliff, but still leave the
Rule 50b motion for the next episode.
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: whitehat on Thursday, June 21 2012 @ 04:28 AM EDT |
| n/t [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 21 2012 @ 06:07 AM EDT |
the are, for the purposes of law and tech, uneducated sensationalists. That is
what their masters at the networks want: not news but ratings, if does not
increase ratings it is not newsworthy to them.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 22 2012 @ 09:47 AM EDT |
I don't know who mirrorslap is in real life, but I suspect that s/he could
now easily embark on a career as a professional author, after witnessing
this trial and describing some of the details just enough to give us a
flavor of what it was like (in addition to what was said). I'm thinking, in
particular, to one of the questions someone asked today about how
s/he heard a lawyer's muttered response to the proposed final order,
because s/he was only 3 rows away.
Thank you again - for your time, your thoroughness, and for your tenacity.
It's sincerely appreciated![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
