decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Nah - it's easy to understand the Gates Foundation | 278 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Nah - it's easy to understand the Gates Foundation
Authored by: Imaginos1892 on Wednesday, June 27 2012 @ 01:34 PM EDT
(battery technology is not there yet, neither are fuel cells, quite,
there's already a ton of investment).
Yabbut it's all being invested in the wrong thing - electric cars designed as
an adaptation of gas-engine cars, and puny 2-3 KVAH battery packs suitable only
for "hybrids", which are a lousy idea from the get-go: the appearance of an
alternate mode of transport without the substance. Most electric car development
is being done by corporations with a vested interest in making electric cars FAIL!!

A properly designed electric car should get 70-80 miles of range from 20 KVAH
of batteries. We could do that, today, with 24 ordinary car batteries. Lead-acid
batteries are far from ideal but they work, they are cheap, they are available
today, and there is already a massive infrastructure in place to support 'em.
There are also better batteries available, today. If we start building electric
cars there will be a major economic incentive to build still better batteries; if
we wait around for somebody to just invent the perfect battery for no particular
reason, we will never build any.

If we burn less gas, that will do all sorts of good around the world.

Yeah, solar panels are manufactured in China - by slave labor, in a complete
absence of environmental regulation. Bring all that investment, manufacturing
and economic activity back to a (semi) free country.

You mention asteroid mining. A practical way to reach orbit is a prerequisite
for any kind of space industry. None of the existing space rocket systems are
in any way practical.
-----------------------------
Major Strasser has been shot! Round up the usual suspects!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )