decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I don't understand why Oracle will appeal | 278 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
It is unlikely they will decline to review it
Authored by: jbb on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 02:59 PM EDT
As you may have noticed, case law on this issue is a mess in the US. IANAL but I think it is likely this case will make it to the Supreme Court so they have a chance to ensure case law on API copyright is consistent. Judge Alsup's ruling was written with this in mind.

---
Our job is to remind ourselves that there are more contexts
than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I don't understand why Oracle will appeal
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 21 2012 @ 03:12 PM EDT
Are they fond of dumping money down a rabbit hole or
something? If they are at all rational, they must realize
that their chance of a significant victory is nearly non-
existent after all the findings of fact went in Google's
favor. Plus, the suit is giving them a major black eye in
the tech industry. I feel sorry for Oracle engineers - they
must hang their heads and sigh when they see news stories
filled with the preposterous hypotheses offered by Oracle
attorneys.

Maybe I'm missing something. The patent issue is over,
right? The court ruled that Android did not infringe on any
of Oracle's patents, and if I understand correctly, that
would be a finding of fact that is not subject to appeal.

The "copyright on API" issue is what can be appealed, but
that seems to me to be such a harebrained idea that I can't
imagine how Oracle could prevail. Such a decision would go
against how the entire industry has operated since
inception.

I think an appeal will just be another opportunity for
Oracle to make themselves look like greedy idiots.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )