decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Definition of Philanthropy | 278 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Ahh.... perspective
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 21 2012 @ 09:17 PM EDT

Ratatouille:

You provide the food, I'll provide the perspective, which would go nicely with a bottle of Cheval Blanc 1947.
You state:
Even a legitimately philanthropic foundation might ask, "is this contribution going to create an ongoing good that is self-sustaining, or will it continue to need contributions?"
My obvious answer is:
    ROI to whom is the key!
If I understand the point of your statement correctly, it's best defined with:
    Give a man a fish and feed him for a meal. Teach a man to fish and feed him for a lifetime.
Would I prefer on-going sustainability? Absolutely - if it comes with freedom. No matter how lenient and giving a Master is... a Slave is still a Slave. Society is Civilized enough most should easily understand why Slavery (whether physical, Legal, Financial or otherwise) is wrong.

As a result:

    Of course, if the helped is receiving the ROI then I'm all for that.
However, ROI is generally used, not from the perspective of the customer (the helped), but from the perspective of the investor.

Ergo... to include the term ROI - rather then sustainability - is to inherently define an investment, not a donation.

Hence my statement:

If the Gates Foundation ever donates those grain patents to the public and teaches the starving in 3rd World Countries how to best farm their own food so the individuals become independent: I'll admit my expectation was totally wrong.
The concept is very simple:
    1) Arm the people with knowledge so they can build their own tools and farm the land successfully - freedom plus sustainability!
vs
    2) Provide the people with food for a price while you prevent them from using the knowledge - sustainability without freedom!
A huge difference between those two. And I believe the Gates Foundation is focused on 2. As I said: I'd love to be proved wrong and the Gates Foundation is in the position to prove me wrong - if they want to.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Definition of Philanthropy
Authored by: PJ on Friday, June 22 2012 @ 05:28 PM EDT
Wait. What? Dictate technology policy? Where
can I go to verify that?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )