|
Authored by: stegu on Thursday, June 21 2012 @ 11:54 AM EDT |
I don't get it. How can destroying Nokia be a plan
in itself? Sure, they might have been afraid that
Nokia would have become a Linux shop that did great,
but they still have to deal with the elephant: Android.
What is the business reason to kill off some smaller,
possibly dangerous fish before you jump in a pool,
but leave the great white shark in there?
I simply don't get it. Why go directly for Nokia's
throat? Or is this plan B that is playing out,
burning the ground at Nokia to make sure that
the Linux initiatives can't be put back on track?
Or are perhaps Nokia's patents all MS ever wanted?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- well... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 21 2012 @ 12:51 PM EDT
- well... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 21 2012 @ 02:37 PM EDT
|
|
|
|