decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
$0 is less than the statutory minimum of $700 | 278 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
$0 is less than the statutory minimum of $700
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 04:06 PM EDT
Which is why the stipulation has a special clause that the $0
amount is intended to evaporate on appeal and should not be
compared to the statutory minimum of $200 for innocent
infringement of RangeCheck plus $500 for willful but limited
distribution infringement of 7 other files. Or maybe that is
$200 + 7 x $500 = $3700.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Can't wait
Authored by: JamesK on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 04:44 PM EDT
They were robbed. They should have been awarded 2ยข. ;-)


---
The following program contains immature subject matter. Viewer discretion is
advised.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Can't wait - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 07:04 PM EDT
    • Can't wait - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 22 2012 @ 09:40 AM EDT
But was it more or less than the SCO vs Autozone settlement?
Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 06:57 PM EDT
We never did get to hear the amount of that one, but as it never showed in the
SCO financials, I think it was probably of similar magnitude.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )