Authored by: mirrorslap on Tuesday, June 19 2012 @ 01:47 PM EDT |
. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 19 2012 @ 04:03 PM EDT |
Ed L. (not logged in)
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 19 2012 @ 04:26 PM EDT |
Being there to report on the actual goings on (as opposed to who is dressed
fashionably) is an excellent value that "modern day investigative reporters"
don't seem to understand!
Your efforts are greatly appreciated.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: 351-4V on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 10:44 AM EDT |
That was some mighty fine work you did reporting on the trial. Your outstanding
efforts are really appreciated by us all. Looking forward to your reports on
this phase.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 02:10 PM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
What is Oracle v. Google worth? For now, $0. A proposed
joint agreement by parties asks judge to award Oracle 00. To
facilitate appeal.
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Zero damages is news to Judge Alsup. who says, "hm."
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
"is there a catch here i need to be aware of?" - Judge
Alsup, always on the hunt for lawyers' trickery.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|