decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Tin Foil Hat time -- hardware limitations are a serious concern... | 188 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Tin Foil Hat time -- hardware limitations are a serious concern...
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 05:37 PM EDT
But, beware, my poster:

Software *does* dissipate power when it runs...I have a motherboard with
discoloration under the CPU to prove it!

(And why do you think every technical person knows a Windows phone will be such
a dog -- might, just might, it involve *way* too many instructions?)

IMHO what I think we need is non-priveleged, and possibly escrowed drivers.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Nvidia largely justified IMHO
Authored by: tiger99 on Thursday, June 21 2012 @ 08:23 AM EDT
If the hardware can be damaged by the software which runs on it, the hardware is designed wrongly. Simple as that, with no exceptions.

I don't know if any Nvidia hardware is in that category, but I would not be surprised. But we have seen it in other places, such as the original Motorola 6800 processor with the HCF (Halt Catch Fire) instruction opcode, or early CRT monitors that blew up if the graphics card was set to inappropriate timebase frequencies. (Actually, I hear that a similar problem is back, after 20 years, with certain flat panel monitors, where there is far less excuse.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )