Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Is there a prevailing party? | 188 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Split Decision?

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 06:55 AM EDT

Oracle could reasonably argue it prevailed on copyrights, and
Google prevailed on patents.

On the surface, this would be a ridiculous claim considering
what they asked for on copyrights was a multi-million dollar
mountain and they're walking away with a few non-magic beans.

However, the SSO complaint was dismissed as baseless in law,
which means of the two claims that were properly before the
jury (timsort and the test files), Oracle prevailed on both...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Is there a prevailing party?

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 20 2012 @ 01:08 PM EDT

Is being found to have infringed my rights on only 2 of the 10 alleged
infringements really a win at all for your side? You are still found to be an
infringer.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )