|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 19 2012 @ 12:46 PM EDT |
I don't understand your question, but PJ covered the May 31 opinion
here. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 19 2012 @ 12:54 PM EDT |
This order does not hold that Java API packages
are free for all to
use without license.
It does not hold that the structure, sequence and
organization of all computer programs may be
stolen. Rather, it holds on the
specific facts of this
case, the particular elements replicated by
Google were
free for all to use under the Copyright Act.
Therefore, Oracle’s claim based
on
Google’s copying of the 37 API packages, including their
structure, sequence
and organization
is DISMISSED
Oracle is correctly stating
that these claims were dismissed
by the court. Nothing nefarious about it.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|