decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Yes, they can | 273 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Yes, they can
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 16 2012 @ 02:55 PM EDT
Yes, they can go home if TSG involuntarily or voluntarily
dissolves as a corporation.

Voluntarily might be tough if there are pending court
issues. But involuntary? Just don't file with the
Delaware department of Corporations for a couple years and
TSG evaporates.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Couldn't they simply buy SCO out?
Authored by: Tolerance on Sunday, June 17 2012 @ 06:39 AM EDT
I thought I read a post recently declaring that SCO shares were worth
essentially zip. Couldn't BSF simply raid the petty cash and buy out the
existing shareholders to terminate the specific performance requirement?

It was my impression that BSF has the case still open so they can piously
pronounce that legal action is still underway. That way, they never have to
admit to clients or media that they lost. Reputation among gangsters is
everything. This appears an analogous situation.

---
Grumpy old man

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )