decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Why did Nokia board cooperate in rape of the company? | 273 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Why did Nokia board cooperate in rape of the company?
Authored by: whitehat on Saturday, June 16 2012 @ 12:48 PM EDT
Are we to assume the board did not understand the effect of an alliance with MS? Presumably, they all have at least average IQ. If they understood, why did they proceed?

Some people say that Nokia had no choice, except an alliance with MS.That is so obviously incorrect. Nokia could have been a leader in Android products. They could easily have had their own "Northern Mint" flavor of Ice Cream Sandwich, and could have benefited in numerous ways from being a leading technology company. Now, they are slaves to MS. Many people told them that at the outset.

Elop's role is easy to understand, but why did board cooperate?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

More bad news for Nokia
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 17 2012 @ 02:54 AM EDT
Microsoft doesn't care if Nokia survives

I would be very surprised if Balmer survives a Nokia debacle. Balmer's strategy for the future was based on Nokia being successful. If Nokia goes under, the press will have a feeding frenzy saying it was Microsoft's fault. The fact that the Lumia phones supposedly got good reviews will only make things worse, as it simply means that Nokia put out good hardware, but they still didn't sell.

If Balmer's head rolls, his replacement would have a hard time continuing with the same failed strategy. It would be a good opportunity to dump all the money losing ventures into consumer markets, web portals, search/advertising, and phones and tablets. Microsoft could sell or close multiple divisions and lay off thousands of employees, and investors would be delighted.

So, Balmer has a lot at stake here. However, Microsoft's own investors might actually benefit more from a complete Nokia failure than they would from the current drizzle of mediocrity.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )