decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Some corrections on the Java ME landscape etc. | 273 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Some corrections on the Java ME landscape etc.
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 18 2012 @ 03:05 PM EDT
  1. Java ME apps were sold directly to consumers with payment via premium SMS messages or through traditional payments. Free apps could just be downloaded from anywhere. All Java ME phones had a minimal web browser and there was *no* lockdown. The only thing carrier specific was setting up a premium SMS number, and there were plenty of "resellers" who had already done that for 99% of the carriers and would sell your content for a percentage.
  2. The absence of lockdown made some features deliberately unavailable to apps.
  3. Shortcomings in Java ME (like being stuck at Java 1.1 language level and not supporting the middle button) and incompetent quality assurance by Sun meant that the list of phone specific bugs was maddening, and that some things that should have standard interfaces had only vendor interfaces.
  4. Touchscreen only phones were available from Palm and from several brands of Windows based phones. Top keyboardless phones from that era included the iPaq (not an Apple brand) series, which originally did not have the phone part, but later did. But there were many others, even Dell briefly had their own model. Obviously, Java was not included by Microsoft, but many vendors preinstalled a 3rd party Java ME implementation.
  5. Note that unlike the suicidal "Windows Phone", "Windows based" phones ("Windows Mobile", "Windows SmartPhone" etc.) were almost as open as Android: All phones were rooted upon delivery, SDKs and source code access was free/cheap. Installation on production phones needed a signature from Verisign or the carrier, but there was no market or licensing restrictions, GPL was OK due to the "Solaris" clause in GPL 2 itself.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )