decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Simple | 273 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
A couple things about Boies
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 15 2012 @ 03:51 PM EDT

Caveat: this is based on how I view his personality given all the background behavior that we - the public - can actually witness.

First:

    Boies has no problem beating a dead horse.... he doesn't even have a problem pretending to beat a dead horse that's not even there.
Second:
    Boies has no problem footing the bill for lawsuits out of his own pocket. One only need review the gardner lawsuit to see that.
As I said: just my humble opinion on his character.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

SCO Files a Request to Submit for Decision in IBM Case ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 15 2012 @ 03:59 PM EDT
Just for fun, I wonder what's going through the mind of Judge Cahn.

I imagine it was something along the lines of "SCO isn't completely dead yet, obviously we haven't been trying hard enough". The principals in the matter won't lose interest until all the money is gone. Another court case will sole that problem nicely, and let Mr. Cahn go on to other more worthwhile pursuits.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Simple
Authored by: sproggit on Saturday, June 16 2012 @ 04:22 AM EDT
He's in it for the money.

As part of the process of taking on the role of Trustee, Cahn secured the
services of Blank Rome, the law firm where he works, to basically take over the
legal services that SCO required to work their way out of bankruptcy.

Don't forget, he's had staff lawyers working on reorganisation plans, the Novell
case, the appeals, winding up bits of the business, selling the Unix business,
and so on.

There's now nothing left in SCO to generate income other than the potential
windfall if they win their case against IBM. (That must be in the Har-Har Galaxy
in the Ho-Ho-Ho Universe, of course...)

But - and this is the important bit - Cahn [through Blank Rome] get paid for
this. He's a lawyer. A good lawyer will always give his client the best possible
advice. We all believe that the best possible advice in this situation is to
drop the case, pay the creditors and walk away.

Don't forget that when SCO filed for Chapter 11 Protection they had enough cash
on hand to pay *all* their creditors and leave enough for a night out for their
employees. They were solvent and had positive cashflow.

Instead, they files for Chapter 11 on the eve of the first trial and have been
running ever since.

Whether it is deliberate or not, what Cahn and Blank Rome are actually doing is
spending their way through the last of the cash that the SCO corpse holds.
Unless they get another injection from the likes of Ralph Yarro or another pipe
fairy, I don't see how they can stay the distance in this one.

After all, look how many years of stringing along they achieved with their
original cases, all because it left Darl free to make grand public proclamations
without having to stand in court and produce hard evidence to back up his
claims. If they can stretch an empty case to last that long, you can bet IBM can
do the same. Maybe IBM will keep them tied up in discovery and motion practice
for a couple of years.

I don't know if any subsequent IBM action is covered under the deal between
Boies and McBride [i.e. paid up front] but if it is, then maybe IBM will just
make this as expensive for BSF as they possibly can until they give up and go
home?

Meanwhile, regardless of motive, Blank Rome [Cahn's law firm] will be able to
submit their monthly bills to the Bankruptcy Court.

Nice work if you can get it...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )