|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 15 2012 @ 04:53 PM EDT |
SCO didn't get any disputed rights at all.
Nothing. It ended up with
what it had to start with, the UNIX business and the right to license it. No one
ever challenged that. What it got in bankruptcy court was the right to break the
contract, its obligations under the APA, and make sure Novell got none of the
money it was due.
I never said anything about SCO getting disputed
rights. In fact, I stated that the rights that they got were pretty much
undisputed because Novell's own witnesses testified that they got them as well,
which were the right to use the code, the right to modify the code and the right
to sell copies of the modified code. I also never said anything about the
bankruptcy, except that they sold off the UNIX business during
bankruptcy.
I agree with you that things could have been clearer in
that article, but nothing was really factually wrong that I read, and it didn't
seem very "slanted" as you described it.
Perhaps it was more
inaccurate and slanted when it was first written, as others have replied to my
first comment saying that it had been changed from when they first read it by
the time that I read it and posted my comment.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|