decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
LGPL | 273 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
License for Raspberry Pi software
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 16 2012 @ 05:34 AM EDT
If the GPL is what you want then that is what you should use. As the copyright
holder you can add a special exception that allows linking to non-GPL code. See
the OpenSSL exception and the GNU classpath exception for examples.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

LGPL
Authored by: scav on Saturday, June 16 2012 @ 05:43 AM EDT
Actually, I'm not sure it is even a problem. Is there a
reason why a GPL program cannot link to non-free libraries?

You can't distribute a non-free program linked to GPL
libraries, but is that actually the same thing? After all,
there are a lot of GPL programs ported to Windows, and they
presumably link to various non-free DLLs.

---
The emperor, undaunted by overwhelming evidence that he had no clothes,
redoubled his siege of Antarctica to extort tribute from the penguins.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • LGPL - Authored by: hardmath on Saturday, June 16 2012 @ 08:21 AM EDT
  • LGPL - Authored by: greed on Saturday, June 16 2012 @ 05:14 PM EDT
License for Raspberry Pi software
Authored by: Gringo_ on Saturday, June 16 2012 @ 07:15 AM EDT

Multimedia on the Raspberry Pi sounds interesting. Can you tell me what kind of graphics processor it has? Can you tell me what kind of audio interface it has? On board sound card? Video memory? I'm wondering if the Raspberry Pi could become a multimedia platform. That certainly would be fun to play with.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

License for Raspberry Pi software
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 19 2012 @ 12:29 AM EDT
Since it would only be useful on the raspberry pi, do you really have to worry
about it being co-opted in closed source software? Why would it be such a big
deal if someone did use it in an application sold for the raspberry pi?
Personally I think that open source is great, but there's no battle going on
between closed source and open. There are some former software giants
struggling to find relevance in the OSS world, but that's no reason to think
that all closed source apps are bad. Preventing a library from being used in a
closed-source app will only ensure that the closed-source apps that do come out
are more expensive, and therefore make the hardware less useful. Just IMO...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )