decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
As I said before: it's perhaps Microsofts most successful yet | 273 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
As I said before: it's perhaps Microsofts most successful yet
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 19 2012 @ 12:01 PM EDT

"Microsofts what?" some might ask.

    Microsofts successful attempt to wipe out a competitor!
And for those that think Nokia wasn't Microsoft's competitor: you're just not paying attention to Microsoft behavior. The moment Microsoft gets it into their mind to enter a given market, everyone in that market including "partners" are now competitors to be destroyed.

I don't think Microsoft has sunk anyone else as quick that weren't significantly smaller businesses then Nokia.

I should add: I don't Microsoft intended to sink Nokia so quickly. The likely strategy was the trip-E method: Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. In this instance I think they were in the Embrace portion of the strategy. It's not really a good thing to sink a competitor who is actually trying to market your product in an industry where you have no product established yet.

One could almost say Microsoft has gotten so good at trip-E that the fruits of their labor are paid out in the very first stage.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )