decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Fair Use isn't a right | 227 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Fair Use isn't a right
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 15 2012 @ 07:05 PM EDT

It's a principle that exhausts rights.

Caveat: I'm one of those that believes Fair Use is a right - a right to the public. Or if you prefer the reverse logic: a limitation on the rights of the Copyright Holder. One might say it's an area that is the right of the public which the Copyright Owner's own rights may not extend.

The point by placing your statement into an equivalent context: I view your position as splitting hairs, so knock yourself out.

And copyright law does not, contrary to what you assert, give the copyright holder any right to profit from their work.
I certainly didn't intend to assert that. To be clear on how I view Copyright:
    Copyright is an exchange to ensure knowledge that would otherwise be kept from the public is disseminated to the public for a Legal Monopoly in the market in order to provide the Copyright Owner a greater opportunity to profit.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )