decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
You can patent a method of putting a chemical into rubber: | 1347 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
An Analogy For A Computing System
Authored by: Wol on Wednesday, June 13 2012 @ 06:18 AM EDT
Just had an idea ...

Just what, exactly, is the difference between a Wacom touchpad where I can use a
stylus to draw a line, and this swype thingy everyone's talking about where I
swipe my finger over a phone screen?

Or is it just that both devices record the movement of the pointer across the
sensitive surface, convert it to a series of co-ordinates (an abstract concept
if ever I saw one), and pass it to an Arithmetic Logic Unit to process, to
convert it into a line (another abstract concept) or a word (yet another
abstract concept).

So WHAT, here, is new about this Swype thingy over the Wacom touchpad that my
colleague was programming twentyfive years ago in the *early* eighties other
than MEANING we ascribe to the signals that come out of the sensor?

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

You can patent a method of putting a chemical into rubber:
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 13 2012 @ 02:40 PM EDT
"You can't patent the act of putting a
chemical into rubber. "

What? Of course you can:

Patent number: 6656999


1. A method of preparing a butadiene rubber latex having a large particle size,
showing good stability and reducing coagulum during polymerization, which
comprises:

(a) pretreating a seed butadiene rubber latex by mixing the seed butadiene
rubber latex with deionized water and a small amount of an emulsifier and
stirring;
(b) preparing an agglomerating latex with a pH value of about 5.08.0 by
mixing a copolymer latex containing unsaturated carboxylic acid having from
about 10 to about 50% by weight of solid content with deionized water and a pH
controlling agent; and
(c) adding the pretreated seed butadiene rubber latex of step (a) to the
agglomerating latex of step (b).

http://www.google.com/patents/US6656999?dq=synthetic+rubber+method+of+preparatio
n&ei=X93YT8y0NcmU2AXIi7S5Dw

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Of course you can patent actions.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 13 2012 @ 02:46 PM EDT
"You can't patent actions."

Of course you can. That's what a process is, a set of actions. I dare say
millions of processes have been patented.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )