|
Authored by: mrisch on Tuesday, June 12 2012 @ 05:05 PM EDT |
Why not? If the functionality is in software, it definitely
shouldn't be patentable. If it's in a circuit, then possibly
it could be
patentable.
The reason is that the claim is not for software.
It's for a
cannon that aims by doing x, y, z, or the process of aiming
a
cannon by x, y, z. The implementation may be in the
written description, but
there is no requirement of software
in the claim. Thus, it doesn't make a
difference how it is
implemented. In that sense, there are no software patents,
only software implementations.
For many software patents, you could create
the same machine
or process with a circuit and it would still infringe. And
for that reason, we should reject obvious circuit based
solutions as readily
as we reject obvious software based
solutions. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|