|
Authored by: PolR on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 12:01 PM EDT |
> Maybe we disagree on what an algorithm actually is.
I use the definition of computation theory. You are free to use the definition
you want but then you are not longer using the term of art mathematicians use.
> Mathematics never processes anything.
This is false. Computations are described in computation theory textbooks. The
point of computation theory is to study computations and this requires some form
of processing.
> It's a way to model nature whether real or abstract.
> Algorithms in mathematics have to do with definition of
> such models.
No, algorithms are separate from the meaning of symbols. This is clearly stated
in computation theory textbooks.
Mathematics is a language and algorithms are features of the language.
Mathematics can be used of model nature. But algorithms are abstract
mathematical entities which exists independently of such models.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|