decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
So why did you use it as justification for a patent on math | 1347 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
So why did you use it as justification for a patent on math
Authored by: jesse on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 03:14 PM EDT
why did you use it as justification for a patent on math when it isn't a patent
on math?

Without the math, the patent is nothing but patenting pre-existing patented
items.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

So the math is NOT patented?
Authored by: jonathon on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 03:36 PM EDT
>This is a new way to use a touchscreen - a way that the inventor claims no
one else discovered.

Going back to those Chicklet keyboards from circa 1985, the only differences
are:
* The keyboard is made of glass rather than plastic;
* It is easier to swipe a glass keyboard on, say, a Samsung Omnia, than it is to
swipe the Chicklet keyboard, and have the correct words be displayed on the
screen.
* The glass keyboard also displays output, whereas the Chicklet keyboard only
handles input;

Circa 1990 I had a mouse on my system. If I ran the right software, and clicked
on the right place on the screen, then a word would be added to the note I was
writing. Not an efficient way to do things, but it was doable. If one had
source code, one could change where the mouse click would be, and the
word/letter to be added.

Combine the swiping action on the Chicklet keyboard, with that virtual keyboard,
except do everything on a touchscreen. The "hard" part is finding the
memory locations for each spot on the touchscreen, and ensuring that the touched
spots are recognized in real time.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )