decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Regarding Skill in the Art | 1347 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Regarding Skill in the Art
Authored by: rcsteiner on Thursday, June 14 2012 @ 02:22 PM EDT
Some solutions only become "obvious" when a need arises to solve a
particular problem, driving people with the need in question to come up with a
viable solution for that particular problem.

If the need in question is based on something not in general circulation, or
something which doesn't actually exist yet at all, the number of potential
solutions will be small because the number of people actually working on (or
even thinking about) the problem is small.

If the need becomes widespread in a very short time, say with the release of the
first popular touch screen device to a general audience, the number of people
capable of producing the solution in question can increase drastically in a
correspondingly short time.

That means that innovation can sometimes legitimately occur in waves, often
being solved using very similar techniques in multiple places, and what is only
obvious to a few at a previous period of time becomes far less novel because the
problem in question is now exposed to mainstream inventors and developers, not
just specialists.

Until handheld computers came along with touch screens, for example, thoughts
and innovations involving touch screens and their usage was largely in the realm
of speculation, since there were no "real world" issues to be solved
using one. Once they became mainstream, solutions to various problems involving
touch screens become far less novel.

That doesn't lessen the value of someone coming up with a good idea first, but
it does mean that the creation of a particular idea or process is sometimes an
accident of circumstance, not an indication of any particular level of skill,
insight, or ability.

Just sayin. :-)

---
-Rich Steiner >>>---> Mableton, GA USA
The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )