Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Oh, I see your confusion... | 1347 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

He didn't do what you said he did, Mr. Risch.

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 12 2012 @ 11:14 AM EDT

I wouldn't trust him to be able to tell the difference between a patent on a
pure algorithm and a patent on something physical which happened to involve
software, but more importantly, he *didn't even try*.

Did you actually read the abstract of the paper?

I suggest you apologize now. Providing false references, ones which don't say
what you claim they say, is a form of academic fraud; don't do it again.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Sorry if there was confusion about what I meant - Authored by: mrisch on Tuesday, June 12 2012 @ 11:32 AM EDT

Oh, I see your confusion...

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 12 2012 @ 11:17 AM EDT

You meant "more like" in terms of "better written".

No, no, I meant "more like the Oracle patents" in terms of
"patents pure mathematics, preempts fields of use, fails to disclose
implementation, obvious, trivial, previously invented...."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )