decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
It is disgusting that you won't listen to facts. | 1347 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Actually, software development will move to China (no patents)
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 12 2012 @ 11:31 AM EDT
That's what will actually happen to the software industry. Linux won't be
destroyed, it'll just move entirely to China.

Any country with software patents will wreck its *domestic* software industry,
and everyday people in places like the US will import "black market"
software from countries which haven't wrecked their industries.

Be assured, China is not going to copy the insane behavior of lawyers and courts
in the US and Europe when it comes to patents.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It is disgusting that you won't listen to facts.
Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, June 12 2012 @ 11:34 AM EDT
And in case it's not clear why FOSS and software
patents are inimical and can't coexist, think
about who has patents. Is it the new guy with
innovation on his mind or is it the incumbents?

I attended a conference once and there was a
gaggle of Microsoft employees there, and one of
them frankly said something like this: We have
more patents than anyone in FOSS, so all we have
to do is keep suing until they have none left and
we still have more.

Is that the purpose of patents, by the way, to
crush the new guys? If not, think about the reality
of what that lawyer said, because it's true. And
the new guys never have the stockpile. Never. It
is the incumbents, and they fight to win, without
regard to the public interest. So it's up to
others, like yourself, who don't make a bundle from
patents, but have a voice to at least think seriously
about what matters most -- rewarding software developers
with double monopoly protectiong, copyright and
patent, and strengthening the old guard at the expense
of the new or sticking to reality, which is math
is not an invention and it never will be, so leaving
it free for all to use freely will result in more
innovation than cutting it off and letting someone
own mathematics.

To say it out loud is to know the answer.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )