decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
It doesn't seem odd at all. | 1347 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Let's try explaining this another way:
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 02:22 PM EDT
The invention of the Jacquard loom *makes* the combination of any punchcard with
the loom obvious, because that is the intended purpose of the Jacquard loom.

The invention of the general-purpose computer *makes* the combination of any
mathematical algorithm (software) with the general-purpose computer obvious,
because that is the intended purpose of the general-purpose computer.

The invention of the automobile *makes* the combination of any collection of
stuff loaded inside the automobile with the automobile obvious, because that is
the intended purpose of the automobile.

Is the punchcard by itself patentable? No, because it's not a machine or
industrial process, it's an abstract representation of information. It is
copyrightable.

Is the software by itself patentable? No, becauseNo, because it's not a machine
or industrial process, it's an abstract representation of information (in this
case mathematics). It is copyrightable.

Is the stuff loaded in the car by itself patentable? Maybe not, or maybe it is.
It's NOT an abstract representation of information, so it could perfectly well
be patentable.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It doesn't seem odd at all.
Authored by: Wol on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 02:46 PM EDT
Sticking with your hardwired loom, your new loom MAY be patentable, because it
is a new special-purpose piece of hardware dedicated to making a particular
pattern. It's hardware, it solves a problem, it is eligible for a patent.

Then along comes the general-purpose loom that is capable of making ANY pattern.
Programming it to produce a pattern identical your hardwired loom is NOT
patentable, because the general purpose loom is simply doing what it was
designed to do - making a pattern - ANY pattern. The fact that the pattern is
identical to your pattern is irrelevant.

And more to the point, it is also not a patent violation, because (as the patent
system is supposed to encourage) the General Purpose loom works around your
patent on your particular wiring pattern.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )