decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
If I make a waveguide with my scissors, shouldn't the waveguide be patentable? | 1347 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
If I make a waveguide with my scissors, shouldn't the waveguide be patentable?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 10 2012 @ 11:31 PM EDT
That is, a waveguide ( tube carrying electromagnetic waves) isn't at all
obvious, given the scissors....

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

new uses of processes ?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 10 2012 @ 11:42 PM EDT
All software is information. It can be encoded in an arrangement of symbols and
transmitted over distance by signaling. Proving that it has no material
existence and exists only as an abstract concept. It is in fact nothing more
than a list of instructions. My understanding is that the courts hold that
neither abstract ideas nor lists of instructions are patentable. Software
performs no function and is part of no process. As it exists only as
information. It is entirely passive, and can only be acted upon by the computer.
The computer is not, and can not, be transformed by software. All it can do is
run the software according to its designed function.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

new uses of processes ?
Authored by: mrisch on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 01:56 PM EDT
Actually, new uses of processes are also patentable.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )