decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Do you believe IDEAS should be patentable? | 1347 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
they are not identical
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 13 2012 @ 05:10 AM EDT
1. You can ask the person that gave them to you which is the infringer.

2. The north and south signals can be decoded with pencil and paper
mental steps or a logic analizer.

3.start the computer in safe mode and run a patent scanner.

4.Ifsoftware were patentable as it should be then it would be the person
that loaded the infringing software that was in trouble, not the innocent
computer turneroner that inadvertently performed a patented method.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Do you believe IDEAS should be patentable?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 13 2012 @ 04:11 PM EDT
two identical machines, one of which is infringing and the other isn't,
If they are identical then they must be exactly the same in every way, thus it is impossible to say that one is infringing and one isn't, because the one which isn't infringing is exactly the same as the other one and so must also infringe.

If one infringes and one doesn't, then they can't be identical and so it should be possible to check the physical object to find the difference between the two (even if it is only in the polarisation of magnetic material on a disk). and so distinguish between them.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )