decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Actually it is pretty obvious | 1347 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Actually it is pretty obvious
Authored by: inode_buddha on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 11:27 AM EDT
"What kind of economy is that? It's like gerbils,
where you wake up one day and mom ate her baby."

Only you could have worked that into a legal discussion re patents. And *that*
is why I love this place! ROFL good one!

---
-inode_buddha

"When we speak of free software,
we are referring to freedom, not price"
-- Richard M. Stallman

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Actually it is pretty obvious
Authored by: mrisch on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 01:02 PM EDT
I'm not convinced that software is different. I just got
done reading 5000 patents from 1790-1839 that covered
implementations that were ridiculously simple once you had
the idea, but the idea was not obvious at the time.

The Supreme Court even let Bell have the telephone for the
a-ha idea of a closed circuit and he hadn't even figured out
how to build it yet.

So, on the one hand I agree that there is a problem with
granting patents on building blocks, but I don't think
software is different in that way.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )