decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Actually it is pretty obvious | 1347 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Actually it is pretty obvious
Authored by: pem on Sunday, June 10 2012 @ 07:47 PM EDT
to anyone who has done any kind of forward error correction, or speech
recognition, or used Markov models.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Only because capacitative touch screens were not common.
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 03:09 AM EDT
As another pointed out, the breakthroughs were capacitative touch screens and
hardware fast enough to track a quickly moving finger. These things were
difficult, and we quite rightly handed patents to the companies that discovered
the solutions to these problems. They produced the chips and screens, or
licensed them on reasonable terms to those that made them. They are everywhere.
Once anyone got one of these devices in there hand, it took them seconds to draw
lines. gestures. swipe. With the hardware, the ways to use it were there. from
there, just a Simple Matter Of Programming, with the product being copyrightable
software.
All the patent for swype meant that only one person could develop it. If swype
had not been handed this patent, then Google would have made a gesture-capable
keyboard the default. As would Apple. So the patent did not produce the swype
keyboard, it merely kept it out of the hands of most of the population. A big
negative.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It goes back to sign language.
Authored by: jesse on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 04:29 AM EDT
And that goes back to the 5th century BC.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )