decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Actually, things are even more complicated than _you_ describe | 1347 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Actually, things are even more complicated than _you_ describe
Authored by: Tkilgore on Tuesday, June 12 2012 @ 05:25 PM EDT
1. Clearly, one of the reasons that there is support in high places for the
patent regime in the U. S. as well as for the copyright regime, and for the
proliferation of software patents in particular, is a perception that such
things can be used to control the rest of the world and pay tribute.

This attitude is extremely shortsighted because:

2. China is not without a patent system of its own.

3. With the long-term imbalance of trade and imbalance of payments, Chinese
companies have been buying American companies which hold U. S. patents,
including many of patents of the type which are being complained about here.
Thus, the U. S. patents owned by those formerly U. S. owned and controlled
companies are owned and controlled by Chinese companies with headquarters in
China.

4. Chinese companies are applying for U. S. patents, too, including software
patents.

Establishment attitudes could possibly change if it were to come to the point
that large numbers of the ridiculous patents which are causing such trouble and
causing such complaints as are manifested in the responses to this article were
owned by foreign companies and foreign governments who would be able to hold the
American economy hostage by the simple expedient of using our own patents and
our own court system which makes it so nearly impossible to challenge the
current status quo.

We live in interesting times, which could get even more interesting.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )