decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Why, for once, doesn't Microsoft just do the right thing? | 102 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections here
Authored by: feldegast on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 03:18 PM EDT
So they can be fixed

---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | # ]

News picks
Authored by: feldegast on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 03:19 PM EDT
Please make links clickable

---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off topic
Authored by: feldegast on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 03:20 PM EDT
Please make links clickable

---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Comes transcribing
Authored by: feldegast on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 03:22 PM EDT
Thank you for your support, book a page to transcribe here
http://ww w.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php%3f page=ComesBooking

---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | # ]

    The June 22nd Hearing in Novell v. Microsoft Already Held Without Public Notice on June 7
    Authored by: BobDowling on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 03:38 PM EDT
    I think we should try to get the minutes of the hearing. It's expensive, ...

    PJ, how much? I have a pointer hovering over the donate button.

    I'm dying to know if Novell commented on the changed time during the hearing itself. I wonder how much notice they got.

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    Why, for once, doesn't Microsoft just do the right thing?
    Authored by: BJ on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 05:11 PM EDT
    After all -- they might stand a chance of being proclaimed
    'Major good guy'  for it, by none other than Groklaw.

    bjd


    [ Reply to This | # ]

    Could June 22nd still be on?
    Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 06:19 PM EDT

    As this was "sub cura", could this be a preliminary hearing in preparation for the June 22 official hearing in Utah?

    Just guessing and trying to assume good faith until otherwise proven.

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    The June 22nd Hearing in Novell v. Microsoft Already Held Without Public Notice on June 7 ~pj
    Authored by: STrRedWolf on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 08:42 PM EDT
    The one question that popped into my mind is that if the court did not issue a
    scheduling meeting or any reason for a private meeting, is it grounds for Novel
    to appeal and have the judge struck from the case?

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    America Online Patent Troll Sues Google, AOL Over Search 'Snippets' and Ad Serving Tech
    Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 10 2012 @ 05:42 PM EDT
    can we please kill software patents now?
    oh yes, and business process patents too

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    re: Updated
    Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 12:54 AM EDT
    PJ, do we know _anything_ about what was decided at the hearing?

    [ Reply to This | # ]

    • re: Updated - Authored by: PJ on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 02:57 AM EDT
    Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Comments are owned by the individual posters.

    PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )