ToE is thought to be 'ordinary', only because one is both used to it, and has accepted its fundamental axioms, unquestionly.

Based on its fundametal axioms, ToE is an extraordnary claim. Esecially because the counter-examples not only refute the different theories that fall under ToE, but are explained, even predictable, by rival, non-ToE , non- theologically based theories.

Its pretty rough on ToE proponents that their evidence is better explained by theories that are verbotem in the classroom.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• And the Band played on and on... - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 10 2012 @ 07:56 PM EDT