decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The Eastern District of Texas | 478 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Eastern District of Texas
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 09:11 AM EDT
Ummm, just what *IS* the geographic span of EDoT?

I mean, more specifically, does it include the metro Houston area?
If so, we're talking about a fairly significant metropolitan area, which would
include the Compaq portion of HP, and possibly Dell's HQ as well. So, it's
not as if we're talking about the eastern district of Montana or Wyoming,
which frankly have very low population densities and aren't that significant
to the high-tech industry. (Don't worry - I do enjoy my steaks, so MT and
WY are appreciated in many other ways!)

OK, it ain't Silicon Valley, but maybe "Silicon Plains" perhaps... or
Swamps...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Eastern District of Texas
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 11:16 AM EDT
One other thing that I seem to remember, is that one of the local lawyers in the town where the courthouse is located, who is hired by a lot of patent holders when filing patent law suits, is the son of one of the district court judges that handles a lot of patent lawsuits...
If that is true, would there not be a conflict of interests

Especially as:

...Nothing has ever been formally alleged, but rumors abound that the judge is favorable to his son's clients, and so more favorable rulings come down as a result.
To prevent such possible rumours and accusations, it would be in the judge's interest not to accept cases filed by his son.

Could anyone [defendant] who gets an unfavourable ruling in that case use that as a basis for appeal: "the judge was [potentially] biased towards the plaintiff as his son was the filing lawyer"?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Eastern District of Texas
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 11:24 AM EDT
Nothing has ever been formally alleged, but rumors abound that the judge is favorable to his son's clients, and so more favorable rulings come down as a result.
To stifle such rumours, can I suggest someone (who can) look into the cases the son lawyer filed, the percentage with his father and each of the other judges, and the percentage won by plaintiff when father, and each of the others, judge.

Similarly for the other filing lawyers.

Only armed with those figures can a true allegation be made - if there is a significant increase in the percentage of father-son favourable judgements, it could look like a case of conflict of interests and bias, and, to be frank, the appropriate authorities ought to be made aware.

Until such time as the stats are done, it is a dangerous topic to discuss.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Comments are owned by the individual posters.

    PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )