decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Sorry...... I don't buy it | 478 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Sorry...... I don't buy it
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 08 2012 @ 08:35 PM EDT

I don't buy the suggestion that not a single Pharaoh abused even a single person for personal "wealth beyond basic survival and comfort". Were all those people burried with the Pharaohs really all necessary for basic survival and comfort?

Perhaps I'm just too inundated with all the rest of the examples of humanity's lack of civilized behavior via the last 2000 years: from Rome's corruption through the dark ages and the Spanish Inquisition and Hitler that I simply can't see such a large group of people over such a large period of time somehow not having the same lack of civilized behavior when other cultures of the time frame showed the same pattern of human behavior - Xerxes anyone?

As for your definition of slavery: you won't convince me - ever - that people be·queathed to their ... "owner's" children along with the cattle does not fit the definition you just provided.

So let's establish my lack of belief that the Egyptian Society of the time should somehow be considered more civilized just because the behaviors were secular in nature rather then without-spiritual-guidance.

Given that - there is the rare chance that the Pyramids were built with everyone involved being totally willing and not held against their will. But given the acceptance to have "enter whatever word to indicate total control to be able to bequeath someone" in general Egyptian society, in my humble opinion it was acceptable within the society to "own people" even though the concepts may very well have been expressed differently. And since such behavior was acceptable, there's no reason to think that at least some of those that worked on the pyramids weren't quite so willing.

Do I understand that it was quite possible "the peoples of the time believed what they were doing was ok" - absolutely. The people of Rome who owned slaves also believed what they were doing was ok.

The US Civil War was - partially - about two groups of people: one who believed slavery was wrong, one who believed it was acceptable.

So yea... it's easy to see how someone growing up in such an environment may view everything as quite acceptable.

But that's no reason we can't examine their behavior under the principles and understanding we have today and call what we see to be a spade a spade.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )