decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Reasonable certainty of intentionality...not hard to do... | 478 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Reasonable certainty of intentionality...not hard to do...
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 10 2012 @ 12:15 PM EDT
It's pretty well shown that there's a *long* distance between
"It happened"
and
"She intended it to happen".

Most of the time, the distinction is fairly easy. Most developers don't
re-write their boot disks very often, since they don't re-write their operating
system very often. Most users aren't even developers. I don't see making it
unscriptable without some explicit action on the owner's part (like specifically
enabling a certain script to do it, outside the script itself) as a problem. If
you want to play, then go ahead...at some point, I have to assume that you are
smart enough to realise that the move is insecure, and you will need to take
other steps if you want assurance that the result is also secure.

And modifying the OS without notice is how most viruses propagate. So forcing
intentionality with *reasonable* certainty isn't all that difficult. I vote the
best method is to have you write out a new boot CD-R. One paranoid user on this
forum already does that; it's an excellent trick.

I've also noticed that, for basic programming and fooling around, I'm using
remarkably old systems -- a 1995 compiler, various 2003 office programs from
Micro$loth, including XP, CodeWright, and an emulator I run under Windows 98.
The functionality has been remarkably stable, except for the tablet/phone
market. So your boot disk should also be stable by default.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )