decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
On Societal blindness | 478 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Bad, probably sexist comment
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 11:14 AM EDT
Wasn't it mostly women who were employed *as* computers, back when it was a job
title?

If so, then women have been in IT longer than men have.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

On Societal blindness
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 11:58 AM EDT

Unfortunately the Societal blindness is all over. On the specific topic of sexism: it's on both sides of the fence.

To try and eliminate the blindness from only one side has never historically worked very well. You end up with the pendulum swinging wildly to the other side and just as much harm being committed - only in the reverse.

To see this in action, all you have to do is have two children who are fighting. Each hitting the other. Then you tell one child that what they are doing is ok, and the other child to stop.

How many times do you think child X will hit child Y before child Y chooses to ignore you telling him/her that hitting is wrong and hit back? I doubt it'll take more then a hit or two.

Caveat: this does not speak to whether or not sexism in one direction is more extreme then in the other direction or more common or more whatever. It simply speaks to the reality:

    If you don't target the harm all around, it's a very long, slow process for Society to improve.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The most women I have worked around was at ATI, a tech company...much less at east engr cos(n/t)
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 12:21 PM EDT
Grace Hopper wasn't "hired" to create Cobol, any more than Linus
Torvalds was "hired" to create Linux.

They just did it.

"Hiring for the big jobs" isn't slanted away from women, it's merely
slanted towards practicing lifestyle-sociopaths.

Focussing on "who accomplishes something useful" rather than
"who's hired" will, in the long run, do more than anything else to
make the two categories more conjoint. Which will benefit the people who
accomplish something useful. Of whatever chromosome configuration.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )