|
Authored by: ThrPilgrim on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 04:05 AM EDT |
1) Increase filing fees by 50%
2) For every granted patent 75% of the filing fee + interest is returned to the
inventor, this is calculated pro rata on the surviving claims of the originally
filed patent.
3) Change the law so that an extension to a patents claims does not reset the
clock on when the patent expires.
---
Beware of him who would deny you access to information for in his heart he
considers himself your master.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Too Weak - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 04:24 AM EDT
- Too Weak - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 04:52 AM EDT
- Sue the Patent Office? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 07:24 AM EDT
- A Sugestion - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 08:37 AM EDT
- A Sugestion - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 09:04 AM EDT
- A Sugestion - Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 10:37 AM EDT
- A Sugestion - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 11:21 AM EDT
- A Sugestion - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 08 2012 @ 04:45 AM EDT
- A Sugestion - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 10:33 AM EDT
- How to reform the US Patent Office - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 10:39 AM EDT
- How to reform the US Patent Office - Authored by: jonathon on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 02:04 PM EDT
|
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 11:42 AM EDT |
Remove patent Appeals from the Federal Circuit.
The idea of a "Specialist Court" has wreaked havoc on patent law and
created additional work for the Supremes, correcting their excesses.
It is well known that many eyes are better that a few.
---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: cjk fossman on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 02:21 PM EDT |
Your first point is going to pack juries with jurors who have
a vested interest in the patent system.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: kjs on Friday, June 08 2012 @ 11:21 PM EDT |
yeah, sure..... Just got a letter from the USPTO about prior art they found for
an application. A short look at it shows that they must have used the following
innovative keywords for the search: "the" and "and". That's
about the only thing the application and the prior art has in common.....
---
not f'd, you won't find me on farcebook[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|