|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 09:40 PM EDT |
| Doesn't everyone know that court is a joke? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 09:42 PM EDT |
What matters is that there is at least one decision against the non-patents
that are being fraudulently used to extort money from organizations.
Does this patent troll realize that every defendent is going to paraphrase
Oracle's suit when they file their motion against this patent troll?
Hasn't Google filed a request for re-examination with USPTO, yet?
If not , odds are that one, or more, of the defendents will work with Oracle
or Google, and make that request.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 10:29 PM EDT |
Oracle filed on June 1. What Lodsys has been
doing, with at least one success, IIRC, is to
argue that it filed against a customer of some
entity that later filed in another state as
itself. The argument goes that if the entity
is filing to protect a customer, then Texas it
shall be.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Cue for a theme? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 08 2012 @ 12:57 PM EDT
|
|
| Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 10:39 PM EDT |
| Try now. I think they all will resolve properly. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
