decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Sorry, can't rescue your Windows machine | 118 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
UEFI - Boot - The ultimate lock-in
Authored by: complex_number on Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 02:20 PM EDT
<a
href="http://www.internetnews.com/blog/skerner/fedora-linux-18-will-boot-on
-uefi-hardware-with-microsofts-help.html">[www.internetnews.com]</a&g
t;<P>
The article whilst covering the subject a lot better than some I've read is
making an assumption that I think might be fatally flawed.
<P>
I have to wonder just how much longer will be able do DIY whet it comes to
making our own PC's. All Microsoft has to do is tell the likes of Gigabyte, Asus
etc that they can't sell a new Motherboard unless it has a Windows 8 license.
<P>
The advent of secure boot and signed keys means that they are going to get far
more control of what we run on our equipment. They could tell the UEFI makers
that DIY MBO's can't have their key in them OR theirs can be the only Key
allowed.
<P>
I think that the resellers (newegg, aria etc) will vote to have the MS key only
solution. At least that way they will continue to get some revenue.
<P>
I just get this feeling that will happen within 18 months of the release of
Windows 8. Perhaps around the time SP1 is released.
<P>
I really would like to be proved wrong.
<P>
On the bright side, if Windows 8 proves to be the flop many of us here hope then
it might well be time for 'the year of the Linux Desktop'.
<P>


---
Ubuntu & 'apt-get' are not the answer to Life, The Universe & Everything which
is of course, "42" or is it 1.618?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Sorry, can't rescue your Windows machine
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 03:21 PM EDT
It's been mentioned elsewhere but bears repeating.

I would like to think that the MS UEFI key will keep admins from rescuing
Windows machines, which, it seems to me, is a major reason why Windows is still
used. It can be fixed.

Well, maybe no longer. How well will the customer base tolerate this? Go buy a
new machine? Wipe and restore? Restore what, if my data can't be rescued? Move
it to the Microsoft cloud and hope there aren't more outages?

Windows becomes even more of a risk to my data.

Well, at least one person thinks getting a white box will still be possible.
Hope he's right. I hope it won't take too many bulk orders of white boxes to
break the Microsoft stranglehold.

In the meantime, it's perversely comforting to see Microsoft keep piling up the
inconveniences to its customers and making Windows harder to use. Maybe it will
put an end to the dual-boot dance and spur moves to Linux alone. Here's hoping
Windows 8 gets the same market reception as Windows phone.

And I don't suppose regulators will take notice of the fact people will have to
pay a company NOT to use its product. How does that work legally?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Avoiding Subject Matter Problems but Creating Written Description Problems
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 04:21 PM EDT

Article link.

From the opinion of this humble, non-legal individual:

    The ones creating the written description problems are the Lawyers using dancing words to get patent grants that should not be granted.
If you honestly describe your invention so another practitioner of the art can duplicate it and the USPTO decides it doesn't deserve a patent grant, then just maybe you should consider the invention is not as novel and unique as you want to believe it is.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

News Picks
Authored by: Wol on Thursday, June 07 2012 @ 11:49 AM EDT
Pick-y news items?

Don't tempt me.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )