decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Samsung to have its cake and eat it too? | 43 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Samsung to have its cake and eat it too?
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 12:43 PM EDT
I really wonder if they are paying, since the terms of those agreements are not
public and subject to confidentiality agreements leaving Microsoft to whisper in
the ears of it agents and spread rumors and disinformation.

Samsung seems to have no trouble waging a global legal war with Apple.



---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.

"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Samsung to have its cake and eat it too?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 02:40 PM EDT
I'm not defending Samsung's deal with Microsoft in any way here, but what does
supporting Linux Foundation have anything to do with their dealings with
Microsoft?

Not to try excuse their dealings with Microsoft (I do think that allowing
Microsoft to make such claims and threats is despicable), but I'm willing to bet
that the fact that Samsung sell many PC related products and other Microsoft
based products would have something to do with what happened with licensing
dubious Microsoft patents for Android.

Note that many of the major manufacturers that have signed agreements with
Microsoft about these patents without ending up in court also have other
dealings with Microsoft (typically, they need massive amount of favourable
Microsoft Windows/Office and other product licenses for their products to
compete on the market effectively). You could argue that Microsoft is using
their monopoly in one market (PC with Microsoft Windows and Office) as a
leverage into other "markets" (mobile devices and patent trolling,
just like they have done with servers and services before this :p). Though I do
agree that this whole patent issue a bad thing, but for many of these
manufacturers, offending Microsoft at this point will probably cost them a lot
more than they can afford. What would you expect them to do? Purposely go to
court (increase expenses) and destroy their products in the market due to not
getting a favourable licensing deal from Microsoft (decrease income)? Their
shareholders will kill them :p.

Not saying that it is fair, but if you look at it from a different point of
view, the more successful the manufacturers are with Linux based platforms, the
less they will rely on Microsoft software, the less likely Microsoft will be
able to get these manufacturers to sign such deals in the future.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )