Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Google is suing based on Motorola's patents - Example please | 300 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Example please

Authored by: LocoYokel on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 07:59 PM EDT

Showing one case where Google is the originator and aggressor and not responding
to an attack made on them.

---
Political correctness is an effort to abrogate the First
Amendment under the assumption that there exists a right to
not be offended and that it has priority

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Example please - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 08:09 PM EDT

Google is suing based on Motorola's patents - Example please

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 08:05 PM EDT

Good point. Mind you - it has been less than 10 days since
the acquisition actually closed.

On the other hand, one of Motorola's lawsuits against Apple
did start ~late Jan 2012, and it is reasonable to believe
that Google authorized that action. I have to admit that
the original source is FM (lots of articles, all citing
him), which makes the truth of the preceding statement less
likely. Sigh. Still, given that Motorola's patent
portfolio will be mostly useless unless Google does
authorize defensive lawsuits...FM might be right for once.

--Erwin

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Is it reasonable to believe Google authorized the action? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 09:59 PM EDT
- Is it reasonable to believe Google authorized the action? - Authored by: JimDiGriz on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 11:42 PM EDT
  - What? - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 12:09 AM EDT
    - What? - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 01:18 AM EDT
      - What? - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 02:58 AM EDT
        From the document - Authored by: jjs on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 06:32 AM EDT
        From the document - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 11:06 AM EDT
        From the document - Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 11:53 AM EDT
        From the document - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 12:28 PM EDT
        From the document - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 12:57 PM EDT
        From the document - Authored by: jjs on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 05:16 PM EDT
        From the document - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 06:25 PM EDT
        Veto power over new Lawsuits - an alternative - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 01:54 PM EDT
  - Sorry Jim. I think you are wrong - Authored by: complex_number on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 01:55 AM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )