decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
From the document | 300 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
From the document
Authored by: jjs on Tuesday, June 05 2012 @ 06:32 AM EDT
(i) subject to Section 5.01(v) and Section 5.01(w), mortgage, pledge, encumber or otherwise subject to any Lien (other than Permitted Liens) or license any material assets (other than Intellectual Property Rights (which are the subject of, and governed by, Section 5.01(j), Section 5.01(v) and Section 5.01(w))), tangible or intangible, except in each case for mortgages, pledges or Liens (i) that are in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (ii) not exceeding $50 million individually or $200 million in the aggregate, (iii) between the Company and a wholly owned Subsidiary of the Company or between wholly owned Subsidiaries of the Company and (iv) pursuant to existing contracts in existence on the date hereof, in accordance with their terms as in effect on the date hereof;

(j) subject to Sections 5.01(v) and Section 5.01(w), license, assign, mortgage, pledge, subject to any Lien, grant a covenant not to sue, or otherwise encumber any Intellectual Property Right, assert any Intellectual Property Right in any new Action or in any counter claim, or amend, renew, terminate, sublicense, assign, or otherwise modify any license or other agreement by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries with respect to any Intellectual Property Right, other than: (i) non-transferable, non- sublicensable, non-exclusive standard licenses entered into in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practices, to any person for sale or distribution of, or use, solely for a Company Product (including to customers, contract manufacturers, developers and resellers) and (ii) declarations of patents to standard setting bodies under pre-existing commitments to declare such patents;

(v) settle any Action (including any Action relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, and including the Actions set forth in Section 3.10 of the Disclosure Letter), providedthat the Company and its Subsidiaries, in any fiscal quarter, may enter into settlements that would not involve any of the following: (i) the sale, mortgage, pledge or other disposition or encumbrance of any Intellectual Property Right or the grant of any license (or similar commitment, such as a covenant not to sue) from the Company or its Subsidiaries (nor any potential obligation to grant the foregoing in the future), (ii) the amendment, renewal, termination, sublicense, assignment, or modification of a license or similar agreement with the Company, or (iii) a commitment to make any payment or provide other consideration where the aggregate value of all consideration in respect of all such settlements entered into in any calendar quarter (or, if there are royalties or other consideration other than fixed cash payments, the reasonable expected value) exceeds the dollar amount set forth on Section 5.01(v) of the Disclosure Letter on a cumulative basis;

Those are the paragraphs I found concerning IP. At most Google has a veto over Motorola's suits. They do NOT have the ability to initiate.

---
(Note IANAL, I don't play one on TV, etc, consult a practicing attorney, etc, etc)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )