decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more... 		decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

Donate Paypal

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
page 11 - Gates properly miffed | 73 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
page 11 - Gates properly miffed
Authored by: PJ on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 03:25 PM EDT
Son, keep in mind that not seeing the specific
email or memo doesn't mean he doesn't know
what it was about. He lived it.

He even claims he doesn't recall being at
the Hood Canal retreat where he decided to
make the U turn to screw Novell.

So, don't assume that any of what he said is so.
The jury didn't, and I'd say they were right.

The lawyer isn't asking him if he knew about
the email. He is asking if he knew about the
issue, so this is just dancing around to avoid
a straight answer. If you read the Comes v.
Microsoft exhibits, as I have been forced to
in order to work on our collection, you look
at what his answers were with disgust, not to
put too fine a point on it. And to then be
snarky with the lawyer for asking ... well, to
me it's worse than rude. I toned down the
adjectives I had in mind, actually.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details ) 		Site layout based on Woodlands theme by Bryan Bell.
Groklaw logo by John Crowley.
News Picks logo by Ted Thompson.
Powered By GeekLog
Created this page in 0.03 seconds