decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
off topic thread | 73 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 03:52 AM EDT
. -> ,
etc

[ Reply to This | # ]

Corrections thread (non-anonymous)
Authored by: nsomos on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 04:32 AM EDT
Please post corrections here.
A summary in the title may be helpful.
Please check against the PDF before suggesting a correction.

The Corrections, News Picks, and Off Topic threads should
not be started by anonymous as not everyone reads anonymous
posts.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off-topic: patents
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 05:01 AM EDT
I found this list of Microsoft patents that are being used to extort fees from
Android distributors:

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/070611-microsoft-android.html

Most of them look completely bogus, though 6,621,746 (flash memory
algorithm) might be valid.

Patent list:

5,579,517
5,758,352
6,621,746
6,826,762
6,909,910
7,644,376
5,664,133
6,578,054
6,370,566
5,778,372
6,339,780
5,889,522
6,891,551
6,957,233

[ Reply to This | # ]

newspicks thread
Authored by: designerfx on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 07:50 AM EDT
newspicks comments here

[ Reply to This | # ]

off topic thread
Authored by: designerfx on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 07:51 AM EDT
off topic comments here

[ Reply to This | # ]

I *so* misread that...
Authored by: inode_buddha on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 08:36 AM EDT
For a moment there, I thought the Clayton Act had a Trolling provision!

---
-inode_buddha

"When we speak of free software,
we are referring to freedom, not price"
-- Richard M. Stallman

[ Reply to This | # ]

PJ, what do you mean, Gates is rude?
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 10:46 AM EDT
Have you seen the video itself? If you are just going by the transcript, could you quote some examples that seemed rude to you?

I've read about 1/3rd of the Gates deposition transcript so far, and I just don't see it. To me (IANAL) it reads like every other deposition of a tech person with possibly selective memory.

Keep in mind, that like most tech people, Bill Gates probably considers lawyers to be a lower life form. He has to be shut up in a room with them for hours while they ask him questions that are obviously designed to convey a certain impression about his past behaviour, an impression which Gates obviously does not agree with. So of course he will be a little annoyed about that.

So far (I am still only 1/3rd through it) I think the most interesting thing about his deposition is that he does not seemed to have learned to just answer the question asked. He often rambles on for several sentences about nearly-unrelated topics, as if he is hoping to somehow confuse the issue or throw Novell's lawyers off the scent. I'm sure his own legal team must have warned him to just answer the questions and not to volunteer any extra information; this style of responding cannot possibly help his case. Nonetheless, he persists.

It might be a personality trait that he just can't help trying to impose his view of things on whoever he is talking to. (Reminds me a bit of Steve Jobs and the famed Reality Distortion Field. All of these billionaire CEOs have significant egos.)

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )