decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Web Stolen | 103 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
News Picks (Web Balancing Act)
Authored by: lnuss on Sunday, June 03 2012 @ 08:05 AM EDT
I'd have to agree with you -- I don't want that personalization, either. It's a
privacy invasion.

---
Larry N.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

News Picks (Web Balancing Act)
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 03 2012 @ 08:07 AM EDT
Maybe? When or if the UN gets control of the web, you will
then see bribery that will control the direction (and, other
countries will then have the power to put their own controls
in place without opposition from the "people" of the world).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Web Stolen
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 03 2012 @ 09:46 AM EDT
Funny how the monied interests have taken over the web.
After an initial hesitation on the whole Internet phenomenon to the brief time
when a company showed hip by having a www.something leading to their on-line
company brochure, there has been a scramble by the corporate body to monetize
the web-thing.
It is increasingly seen as a marketplace where information is the commodity.
The problem with this is that once the stall-holders are in place, they want ALL
the land to themselves and will go to any length to make it so.
It is theft of public property (the infrastructure) that the public is powerless
to resist, simply because their representatives have long since fallen in love
with all that money can buy.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

News Picks (Web Balancing Act)
Authored by: Wol on Sunday, June 03 2012 @ 12:22 PM EDT
And if the search engines give you the news they think you want to see, how do
you find the news you really want?

Mind you, sometimes I wish that DID work. All too often when I search on a
product, I've got it and want support. So why do search engines always tell me
where to buy it when I've already got it !?!?!?

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

News Picks (Web Balancing Act)
Authored by: tknarr on Sunday, June 03 2012 @ 12:50 PM EDT

I think it's a different definition of "personalization". When I run a Web search, for instance, I'd prefer it if any ads served up alongside the search results pertain to what I was searching for. If I'm reading a particular story on a Web site, the ads I find most useful (and that I'm most likely to look at) are ones that pertain to the material in the story. But that kind of personalization doesn't depend on knowing anything about me, only about what I'm doing at that moment (which the Web site knows already).

What the advertisers want, OTOH, is to know so much about me personally that they can ignore what I'm doing at the moment and target me with the ads most likely to convince me to buy what their customers are selling. Which is counter-productive actually, because most of the time I'm not interested in being actively marketed to and the constant pestering just annoys me. Think of it like street hawkers. If you're already looking to buy a wristwatch, you might not mind them announcing what kinds they've got for sale. But if you're on your way to a dentist's appointment, or even if you're out shopping but it's for flowers for your girlfriend, then even if you happen to badly need a new wristwatch you're not interested in that right now and a constant stream of guys snagging your arm going "Hey, want to buy a cheap genuine Rolex?" is going to do nothing but put you in a right foul mood tout suite.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )