decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Off Topic | 103 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Off Topic
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 04 2012 @ 07:23 AM EDT
Answer: the judge indicated it would be statutory only.
But from what I've read here, there seems to be a lot of variance in what those damages would be, depending on multiple factors, willfulness being one of them
30 days to file a notice of appeal, and then 60 more days to actually file the brief, although there are footnotes for corner cases, as always with the law.
But does that start now? or do we have to wait until the final damage numbers? Also, can the damage numbers be kept secret?
Yes.
I hope they do. I mean, given that those are test files, meaning that they serve to check compatibility, wouldnt that fall under the Sony vs Conectix case?
I'm not sure on this, as I'd have to check the settlement agreement. But with statutory, and considering the judge told Oracle it was just a mistake and considering what he wrote about the test files in his ABI ruling, I think we can forget willfulness.
So the ceiling and floor for statutory damages drop substantially...
I'd never seen that "rule" before, and this is in a different Circuit, the 9th, N. CA., so what happened in SCO wouldn't necessarily apply here. The 10th Circuit is weird. (oops. did I say that out loud?)
Thanks PJ. Mind you, as someone from the other side of the pond, I find your legal system perplexing (I mind mine too, but in a different way)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )