Possibly something that ends up harming Google in the long run?

Over the years we've seen why the rule of "don't speak about a case" is so very true in the context of all three timelines:

Before the case.

During the case.

After the case.

I can understand why Google is giving little more then: no comment!

We believe the Court Record and Judge's rulings all speak for themselves. We are very glad to have the rulings we have had. Thank You!

On the other hand, I expect a lot of Legal experts (along with a few not-so-experts [NSE]) to honestly (no so much applied to the NSEs) examine the situation and speak of their own impressions on the matter and the impact thereof. Why? Because they didn't play a role in the case and so don't have to be so careful.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]